brianchitester.comPosts

All the World Is Staged

For too long, humanity has been held hostage by a single, exhausting demand: be real. Be authentic. Be vulnerable. Show up as your true self. We have built an entire moral economy around the idea that the genuine article is worth more than the convincing copy — that the meal matters more than the photograph of the meal, that the trip matters more than the post about the trip. What a tiresome, expensive superstition. I’m delighted to report it’s dying.

We stand at the dawn of a more honest age. An age that has finally stopped pretending to care whether the plane left the ground.

The critics, of course, are wringing their hands. They speak of “the death of authenticity” as though we’ve lost something, as though an influencer photographed on a parked private jet has been robbed. Robbed of what? The turbulence? These are the same people who insist that a sunset is more beautiful if you didn’t photograph it, a claim no one has ever been able to verify and which sounds, frankly, made up.


The honesty of the staged

Let us be clear about what the parked-jet photographer has actually done, because it is more honest than what his critics do.

He has identified the thing his audience wanted — the feeling of altitude, of arrival, of having made it — and he has delivered exactly that, at a fraction of the cost, with none of the waste. He has not lied. He never claimed to be flying. He simply declined to spend forty thousand dollars manufacturing a fact that the photograph could not have recorded anyway.

Compare this to the authentic man, who actually buys the plane ticket, actually endures the flight, actually accumulates the carbon and the jet lag and the lost weekend — and then posts the identical photograph. The two images are indistinguishable. The only difference is that one man wasted a fortune proving something to no one, and the other did not. And we are asked to admire the first man? For his suffering? This is not virtue. This is a receipt.


Effort was always the scam

Here is the part the romantics cannot face. The premium we placed on authenticity was never really about the product. It was about the cost. We admired the hand-thrown pot over the factory mug not because the pot was better — it usually leaks — but because someone bled for it, and we have a primitive instinct to confuse expense with worth.

This was a useful instinct back when faking things was hard. When the only way to look like you’d written a novel was to write a novel, “looks like a novel” was a reliable signal, and we could be lazy and trust the signal. But the signal was always a proxy. We never actually wanted the suffering. We wanted the thing the suffering used to be the only way to get. And now there are other ways to get it. To mourn this is to mourn the Birkin waitlist now that the superfake rolls off the same Guangzhou factory floor as the genuine article — same leather, same stitch, two hundred dollars. Nobody wanted the waitlist. They wanted to be seen carrying the bag, and called the queue “craftsmanship” because the queue was the only door into the room.

The death of authenticity is simply the moment the proxy got unbundled from the product. You can now have the arrival without the commute, the photograph without the flight, the document without the long dark night of actually thinking. The critics call this hollow. I call it efficient. The hollowness was always the point — we just used to have to fill it with our one finite life, and now we don’t.


Everyone was faking it anyway

There is also the small, impolite matter of the alternative, which never existed.

The authenticity merchants would have you believe that before all this, people walked around radiating their true unmediated selves. Have they met a person? The job interview, the first date, the holiday card, the eulogy that politely omits the deceased’s worst quality (Uncle Don’s never mentioned the casino debt or the second family in Reno) — every one of these is a staged plane on a runway, and we have always understood this, and we have always been grateful. Authenticity in its pure form is what we call a medical condition. The man who says exactly what he thinks at all times is not admired. He is managed.

So the death of authenticity is not the death of anything real. It is the death of a performance of sincerity — a performance that was itself fake, and exhausting to maintain, and which we can now mercifully retire. We are not becoming liars. We were always performing. We have merely been freed from the additional labor of performing sincerity about the performance.


The mercy of the beige

And consider, finally, the kindness of it. The authentic life was a tournament almost everyone lost. Only a few could actually fly the plane, write the novel, climb the mountain. Everyone else stood at the rope, faces pressed to the glass, told that the real thing was the only thing that counted and that they would simply have to go without.

The staged runway is open to all. The unbundled signal is democratic. Now everyone can have the photograph, the polished memo, the curated self — and the playing field, for the first time, is level, because we have agreed to stop checking whether anyone actually went anywhere. We have extended to the entire human race the dignity we once reserved for the genuinely accomplished: the right to look it.

So let the authentic few keep their turbulence and their carbon and their callused hands. Let them suffer, if they enjoy it. The rest of us will be on the runway, smiling out the window, with a flute of André in hand that will photograph, to the last bubble, as Dom.

Satire. This post is AI-generated for fun and does not reflect my actual views.

11 Comments

12,847 readers are commenting
Comments are reviewed by our editorial board before publication.
BW
Brad WhitcombVerified📌 Editor's Pick16 hours ago
Read this twice before my cold plunge. Most operators will skim it. The 10% who internalize it are about to compound. This isn't a piece about influencers. It's a piece about signal arbitrage. 3 takeaways I'm taking into the partner group Monday: 1. The parked jet is the highest-agency play in the deck — same photograph, $40K of waste removed. That's not laziness, that's margin. 2. Effort was always a proxy. The superfake Birkin off the same Guangzhou floor is the unbundling thesis in one bag. The waitlist was never the product. 3. "The hollowness was always the point" — let that sink in. The people still filling it with their one finite life are paying retail for a wholesale signal. The André-that-photographs-as-Dom line is the whole playbook. Skin in the game was never about the game. Saving this one. Cross-posting to the Substack. Curious — who else is seeing the asymmetry here?
312·
GU
guest_44715 hours ago
brad you read a satire about fake people and took 3 takeaways to the partner group, you ok
188·
LH
Linda Halloran7 hours ago
CONCERNED: I am very glad this post by someone finally said it out loud. Buddy and I were on our walk Tuesday past the gray colonial on Pemberton (you know the one) and there was a brand new SUV in the drive with no plates, and a woman taking pictures of herself by it for the longest time... now I read here about "superfake" handbags coming off some factory floor and staged photographs of planes that never left the ground and I think we all know what is going on right under our noses. I'm not dramatic BUT I also got an email last week saying I had won a cruise, which I most certainly did not. Lt. Reynolds, are you reading this? The Selectmen need to put this on the agenda before someone in this town actually pays two hundred dollars for one of those fake bags and gets taken for the rest. EDIT: I called the station and was told the email cruise is "a known scam." Then why is no one warning people. EDIT 2: My grandson says the plane photo thing is "just an influencer." This isn't the town I moved to in 1987.
29·
GU
guest_44713 hours ago
ma'am the gray colonial on pemberton is not a suspect
214·
LH
Linda Halloran2 hours ago
I am documenting this reply for the record. Timestamped 4:52pm. "ma'am the gray colonial on pemberton is not a suspect" — I have copied this exact wording into a Word document just in case it is deleted later, which is what these people do. I'm not dramatic BUT I have now re-read your comment three times and I have concluded you are using the word "ma'am" SARCASTICALLY... That changes things. A rude remark is one thing. But sarcasm directed at an older woman, repeatedly, in a public forum, is a PATTERN OF CONDUCT. I saw a segment on Channel 5 about exactly this and the term they used was "digital harassment." My question, and I am asking sincerely, is whether comments-section harassment of this nature is a chargeable offense under Massachusetts General Laws. I believe it may be. I have already forwarded a screenshot of your reply to Lt. Reynolds along with my original concerns about the staged photographs. Buddy started barking the moment I opened the laptop. He does not bark at nothing. EDIT: I never named the gray colonial on Pemberton. The fact that YOU brought up that specific address tells me you know more about that property than a normal person would. I have added that to the document. Lt. Reynolds — please disregard nothing in this thread. EDIT 2: guest_4471, a real person uses their real name. This is also being noted.
14·
HP
Hattie M. Pemberton@HattiePembertonHome · 247k7 hours ago
Hi loves — such a meaningful piece. So much truth here about protecting what's real in this season. M. and I were just talking about this over our slow-pour Sunday: the world really is staged now, and we've made it our family's whole intention to step back into the genuine article. We took our *Eloise* (she's 8!) out to the back pasture this week to hand-letter a nature journal and the *shift* in her little spirit was so real — no screens, just wheat fields and birdsong. Speaking as a mother of five, the line about "the meal mattering more than the photograph of the meal" gave me actual chills, because that is the rhythm we've been building since I stepped away from corporate. P.S. — my new course *Slow & Sacred: Building Authentic Rhythms at Home* opens enrollment Friday, with a full module on Tuesday sourdough and tablescaping with intention. Use code **UNBUNDLED** for 15% off, friends. Praying for a more honest age. xo. 🌾🤍🍞
142·
R(
robin (they/them)@softgrudge.bsky.social7 hours ago
CW: labor exploitation, burnout hi — i don't usually comment but i've been sitting with this one for a day and i need to name what's happening. as someone who's spent years in publishing-adjacent precarity and is currently navigating chronic burnout, this piece landed strangely for me. you write "the superfake rolls off the same guangzhou factory floor" like it's a clever little punchline — but there are *people* on that floor. garment workers, mostly women, in a counterfeit supply chain with no protections, no recourse, no flute of andré. the whole "democratic playing field" framing erases them completely. that's the venture-capital line in an ironic font, folks. it dresses up extraction and calls it access. and "the document without the long dark night of actually thinking" — that document doesn't come from nowhere either. it's stitched together from scraped writing and the underpaid hands of data workers and the gig influencers churning unbundled content for platforms that keep the margin. you've identified real labor and then made it disappear. that's not honesty. that's the oldest scam there is. i'm not asking you to stop writing. i think there's a genuinely sharper version of this piece — one pointed *up*, at the platforms and the capital, instead of past the people holding the whole thing together. consider who this serves. calling this in with care. — robin (they/them) 🌱
73·
TR
tri_x_pushed_68r/analog7 hours ago
The way you keep saying "the photograph" as if it's one undifferentiated thing tells me you've never actually held a negative up to a loupe in your life. There is an ocean of difference between a staged influencer JPEG — a sensor guessing at light, eight-bit, baked, gone — and a real photograph, which is a physical exposure of actual photons off an actual scene onto a silver-halide emulsion you then have to soak in chemistry to coax into being; Tri-X pushed to 1600 in Diafine has a grain structure that is literally a record of where light hit, it cannot be "unbundled" from the flight because the negative IS the flight. You're conflating the post-2012 phone-grid era (your "staged plane") with the entire medium, and anyone who actually engaged with photography knows the early-90s amateur-color phase, the Portra 160NC vs 160VC split, the death of Kodachrome in 2010 — none of that collapses into your tidy little "every photograph is fakeable." I shot a wedding on a Hasselblad 500C/M with an 80mm Planar in '97 and I have the negatives in archival sleeves to prove the day happened, which is more than your beige runway can say. Here's the part you fumbled: even your parked-jet hero, if he shot that runway on Ektar 100 with a Nikon FM2, would walk away with a true latent image of a real moment — staged subject, sure, but a genuine document — and the fact that you can't see that distinction is what's wrong with the essay, not authenticity. I'll die on this hill. (Also yes I still develop C-41 at home at 102°F in a Jobo — different conversation, but no, the negative does not lie.)
84·
GU
guest_44714 hours ago
imagine developing c-41 at 102°F just to lose an argument in a comment section 💀💀💀
167·
FA
factsmatter_427 hours ago
uhhh actually superfake Birkins do not cost two hundred dollars, the good ones run $1,500-$4,000 because the leather alone isn't cheap. as someone who actually works adjacent to this industry, if you can't be bothered to google a single number why should i trust your grand theory of authenticity. do better
88·
GD
Glenn — The Unstaged Dispatch6 hours ago
Brave piece. But you stopped at the runway when the *real* story is the hangar. What no one will say: the parked-jet photo isn't a trend. It's a *product*. Quietly, in 2019, the first "static aircraft" photo-studio listings appeared at three regional FBOs — Van Nuys, Opa-locka, Scottsdale. You can rent a grounded Gulfstream by the hour. Oh, you didn't know that? Yeah. Notice the timing. The Authenticity Index — Edelman ran a version of it, look at the 2021 trust deck — cratered the exact quarter the superfake Birkin pipeline went mainstream. That is not a coincidence. That is a *handoff*. Instagram is in on it. The charter brokers leasing dead planes as backdrops are in on it. Hermès is in on it — they *want* the superfake, it does their marketing for free. The AI image labs are in on it; they didn't "disrupt" photography, they were *built* to retire the concept of a witness. And André and Dom? Same vineyard consortium since 2017. They've been pricing the gap on purpose. My cousin does ground crew at a private terminal in Westchester. He says the "photo bookings" outnumber the actual departures now. I've seen the manifest. The author saw the plane. He was too embedded to ask who parked it. Wake up. Connect the dots.
71·
+7
+998 90 412 7785WhatsApp5 hours ago
GOOD DAY MA'AM 🙏 my name Mrs. Aisha I am SEE you want be famous personal brand, I sell 50,000 REAL human follower plus verified blue check delivered FAST no problem. We make you viral engagement package TODAY limited spot only 💰 the price very low for serious client ONLY, NO BANK INVOLVED quick close. Please WhatsApp me immediate do not waiting, time sensitive opportunity 🚀💋
-6·
2026 © Brian Chitester.